Suppose that there were no cafeterias receiving federal funding in schools and parents were responsible for packing their children's lunches, would the government pass regulations to cover what kids could bring to school for lunch? Honestly, looking at the shape that some young kids are in I don't blame Mrs. Obama for at least trying to do something, but it starts at home with responsible parents. Government can't and should not try to be responsible for everything....it doesn't work!
Some school districts quit healthier lunch program
AP
8/27/2013 5:08:34 PM
(AP) Some school districts quit healthier lunch program
By CAROLYN THOMPSON
Associated Press
After
just one year, some schools around the country are dropping out of the
healthier new federal lunch program, complaining that so many students
turned up their noses at meals packed with whole grains, fruits and
vegetables that the cafeterias were losing money.
Federal
officials say they don't have exact numbers but have seen isolated
reports of schools cutting ties with the $11 billion National School
Lunch Program, which reimburses schools for meals served and gives them
access to lower-priced food.
Districts that rejected the program
say the reimbursement was not enough to offset losses from students who
began avoiding the lunch line and bringing food from home or, in some
cases, going hungry.
"Some of the stuff we had to offer, they
wouldn't eat," said Catlin, Ill., Superintendent Gary Lewis, whose
district saw a 10 to 12 percent drop in lunch sales, translating to
$30,000 lost under the program last year.
"So you sit there and
watch the kids, and you know they're hungry at the end of the day, and
that led to some behavior and some lack of attentiveness."
In
upstate New York, a few districts have quit the program, including the
Schenectady-area Burnt Hills Ballston Lake system, whose five lunchrooms
ended the year $100,000 in the red.
Near Albany, Voorheesville
Superintendent Teresa Thayer Snyder said her district lost $30,000 in
the first three months. The program didn't even make it through the
school year after students repeatedly complained about the small
portions and apples and pears went from the tray to the trash untouched.
Districts
that leave the program are free to develop their own guidelines.
Voorheesville's chef began serving such dishes as salad topped with
flank steak and crumbled cheese, pasta with chicken and mushrooms, and a
panini with chicken, red peppers and cheese.
In Catlin, soups
and fish sticks will return to the menu this year, and the hamburger
lunch will come with yogurt and a banana _ not one or the other, like
last year.
Nationally, about 31 million students participated in
the guidelines that took effect last fall under the 2010 Healthy,
Hunger-Free Kids Act.
Dr. Janey Thornton, deputy undersecretary
for USDA's Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, which oversees the
program, said she is aware of reports of districts quitting but is still
optimistic about the program's long-term prospects.
"Many of
these children have never seen or tasted some of the fruits and
vegetables that are being served before, and it takes a while to adapt
and learn," she said.
The agency had not determined how many
districts have dropped out, Thornton said, cautioning that "the numbers
that have threatened to drop and the ones that actually have dropped are
quite different."
The School Nutrition Association found that 1
percent of 521 district nutrition directors surveyed over the summer
planned to drop out of the program in the 2013-14 school year and about 3
percent were considering the move.
Not every district can afford
to quit. The National School Lunch Program provides cash reimbursements
for each meal served: about $2.50 to $3 for free and reduced-priced
meals and about 30 cents for full-price meals. That takes the option of
quitting off the table for schools with large numbers of poor
youngsters.
The new guidelines set limits on calories and salt,
phase in more whole grains and require that fruit and vegetables be
served daily. A typical elementary school meal under the program
consisted of whole-wheat cheese pizza, baked sweet potato fries, grape
tomatoes with low-fat ranch dip, applesauce and 1 percent milk.
In
December, the Agriculture Department, responding to complaints that
kids weren't getting enough to eat, relaxed the 2-ounce-per-day limit on
grains and meats while keeping the calorie limits.
At Wallace
County High in Sharon Springs, Kan., football player Callahan Grund said
the revision helped, but he and his friends still weren't thrilled by
the calorie limits (750-850 for high school) when they had hours of
calorie-burning practice after school. The idea of dropping the program
has come up at board meetings, but the district is sticking with it for
now.
"A lot of kids were resorting to going over to the
convenience store across the block from school and kids were buying junk
food," the 17-year-old said. "It was kind of ironic that we're
downsizing the amount of food to cut down on obesity but kids are going
and getting junk food to fill that hunger."
To make the point,
Grund and his schoolmates starred last year in a music video parody of
the pop hit "We Are Young." Instead, they sang, "We Are Hungry."
It was funny, but Grund's mother, Chrysanne Grund, said her anxiety was not.
"I
was quite literally panicked about how we would get enough food in
these kids during the day," she said, "so we resorted to packing lunches
most days."
No comments:
Post a Comment