Monday, September 16, 2013

Pathetic Media Bias


The Media Protect Obama Where It Counts

President Obama and his media enablers are trying to spin the Syria fiasco or, failing that, distract attention from it. Via Mark Steyn, Ace of Spades makes a nice catch. Time magazine publishes four editions: Europe/Middle East/Africa, Asia, South Pacific and United States. This week’s foreign editions all acknowledged the big news story of the week, and if their covers are a guide, didn’t try to paper over the disaster. This is the Europe/Middle East/Africa cover:

Note that the cover text doesn’t pull any punches:
America’s weak and waffling, Russia’s rich and resurgent–and its leader doesn’t care what anybody thinks of him.
The Asia edition:

The South Pacific edition:

And, finally, the U.S. edition:

No “America’s weak and waffling” for American readers! Nope, that might be a little more truth than they are prepared to handle. You wouldn’t want to take any chances with those pesky voters. Historically, the purpose of the press was to inform people. But the principal purpose of our laughably misnamed mainstream media is to prevent people from learning things that might not be good for them. Or, rather, for the Democratic Party.

More Summers Fallout


Apparently, the President's team was doing a lot of behind the scenes work to get Larry Summers into position for Fed. Chairman, but his own party rebuked him. Obama is losing his grip at the wrong time, and the Syrian affair has clearly weakened him as we have previously said. When sharks smell blood in the water, particularly sharks who are up for reelection next year, they don't care who they bite.

Summers Quit Fed Quest as Democrats Spurned Obama Favorite


The Memorable Moments of Larry Summers
Lawrence Summers’s withdrawal as a candidate for Federal Reserve chairman came after an unprecedented campaign to stop a Fed nominee even before he was announced, spearheaded by Democratic senators who took on a president of their own party.
People close to the process said Lawrence Summers, former secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, was President Barack Obama’s top pick all along, even though White House officials late last week insisted the president had yet to make a decision. Photographer: Joshua Roberts/Bloomberg
Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Andrew Balls, head of European portfolio management at Pacific Investment Management Co., discusses Lawrence Summers's withdrawal as a candidate for Federal Reserve chairman and expectations for a Fed led by Janet Yellen. He speaks from London with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television's "The Pulse." (Source: Bloomberg)
Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Simon Johnson, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Bloomberg View columnist, talks about Federal Reserve policy and Chairman Ben S. Bernanke's potential successor. Johnson speaks with Sara Eisen and Tom Keene on Bloomberg Television's "Surveillance." (Johnson is a Bloomberg View columnist. The opinions expressed are his own. Source: Bloomberg)
Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Edward Lazear, a professor at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business and former economic adviser to President George W. Bush, talks about Lawrence Summers’ withdrawal from consideration as a candidate for Federal Reserve chairman. Lazear, speaking with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television's "In the Loop," also discusses the 2008 financial crisis. (Source: Bloomberg)
Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, talks Lawrence Summers’ withdrawal as a candidate for Federal Reserve chairman and financial regulations. Warren speaks with Peter Cook on Bloomberg Television's "In the Loop." (Source: Bloomberg)
Summers Quit Fed Quest After Democrats Spurned Obama Favorite
For the Obama administration, the push for Summers to replace Bernanke served to ignore a dynamic that has developed in the Senate Banking Committee. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
The decision by Summers, the former Treasury secretary and economic adviser to President Barack Obama, followed Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee publicly and privately signaling their concerns about Summers to the White House.
Several Democratic senators, including Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Sherrod Brown of Ohio, mounted a sustained lobbying campaign, pressing colleagues in their own party to oppose Summers on the grounds that he was too lax on financial regulation. They pressed forward as the White House was focused on building support for a military strike in Syria.
“Any possible confirmation process for me would be acrimonious and would not serve the interests of the Federal Reserve, the administration, or ultimately, the interests of the nation’s ongoing recovery,” Summers wrote in a letter yesterday to Obama.
People close to the process said Summers was Obama’s top pick all along, even though White House officials late last week insisted the president had yet to make a decision.

Leading Candidates

Summers, 58, and Fed vice chairman Janet Yellen, 67, were reported to be the leading candidates. Obama also has said he interviewed Donald Kohn, 70, a former Fed vice chairman. Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner isn’t interested in the job, even after Summers’s withdrawal, said a person familiar with Geithner’s thinking.
Investors are debating the speed at which the Fed will taper its $85 billion in monthly bond purchases. Traders had speculated that, given Summers’s past questioning of the effectiveness of quantitative easing, he may have pulled back stimulus faster than other candidates such as Yellen. Stocks rose and the dollar fell today.
The U.S. currency weakened against 15 of 16 major currencies tracked by Bloomberg. It fell 0.4 percent against the pound and 0.6 percent versus the euro. Treasuries rose, pushing the 10-year yield down 8 basis points to 2.81 percent.
The Stoxx Europe 600 Index advanced 0.8 percent to a five-year high and the MSCI Asia Pacific Excluding Japan Index added 1.6 percent with Japanese markets closed.

Tester’s Announcement

Democratic opposition to Summers’s possible nomination had been building, spurred in part by the efforts of Merkley and Brown, who placed calls to advocacy groups and used weekly caucus lunches to lobby fellow lawmakers to oppose Summers.
On Sept. 13, Montana Senator Jon Tester, a Democrat, announced he would oppose Summers, bringing the number of “no” votes on the Senate Banking Committee to three, including Merkley and Brown.
The pitch from Merkley and Brown to fellow Democrats was this, according to Senate Democratic aides: if you think you’re going to vote against Summers, speak up now, because it’s less embarrassing to Obama to stop Summers before he’s nominated than after a messy confirmation fight.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat and critic of Wall Street, also was involved. She informed the White House last week she would oppose Summers, according to a person familiar with the matter.
“Larry was not my first choice for Federal Reserve chair,” Warren said in an interview today with Peter Cook on Bloomberg TV.

Yellen ‘Fan’

“I’m a big fan of Janet Yellen,” Warren said today. “I think she’s terrific. She’s got the right experience and I think she’d make a terrific Federal Reserve chair.”
Her vote would have meant at least four Democrats on the banking committee were opposed to Summers. The White House would have had to rely on several Republican votes to get him out of the 22-member committee.
The Democratic effort spilled into the open when a senator off-handedly acknowledged in late July the existence of a letter of support for Yellen. That letter, drafted and circulated by Brown, was signed by 20 senators.
The letter touched a nerve in the White House, and with Obama himself. He defended Summers days later in a closed-door meeting with Democrats on Capitol Hill, while mentioning that Kohn also was under consideration.
As Democratic opposition grew, Summers’s supporters say the White House didn’t effectively push back. Summers was left vulnerable to what some called a “perfect storm” of events: the delay in his formal nomination, the debate raging over Syria, and the upcoming budget fights with Congress, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Syria Distraction

In late August, the White House sanctioned former administration officials Stephanie Cutter and Jim Messina to work to counter anti-Summers reporting without ever marshaling current administration officials, many of whom, including most of the economic team, supported Summers, according to people familiar with the situation.
A tight circle of the president’s advisers, convened to weigh various Fed candidates, stopped meeting once Syria dominated the agenda and Obama’s attention turned to the divisive debate of whether to begin a military strike in response to the Aug. 21 chemical weapon attack that killed more than 1,400 people.
While Obama’s aides insisted that the Fed chairman’s confirmation process wouldn’t get wrapped up in the budget fights set to start in September, Summers was emerging as collateral damage, the person familiar with the situation said.

‘Critical Member’

Obama, in a statement yesterday, called Summers “a critical member of my team as we faced down the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.” He touted Summers’s “expertise, wisdom and leadership” for helping guide the crisis response and nascent recovery.
Since June, when Obama in an interview with Charlie Rose indicated he wouldn’t appoint Ben S. Bernanke to another term, intrigue over whether the president would pick Summers or Yellen turned into a political process that Fed watchers called unprecedented.
The central bank is considering whether to begin to reduce the unprecedented bond purchases that have fueled a four-year market rally. Bernanke’s term ends Jan. 31.
As signs over the past few months continued to point to Summers as the leading candidate, 40 percent of investors, analysts and traders who are Bloomberg subscribers saw Summers getting the job, according to a Bloomberg Global Poll.
Still, Yellen was viewed more favorably among investors, with 60 percent of respondents holding a positive view, compared with 37 percent for Summers. Thirty-five percent had a negative view of Summers, compared with 15 percent for Yellen.

Clinton Record

Summers was pegged by his opponents as a deregulator for his support of loosened rules on the financial industry during President Bill Clinton’s administration.
In 1998, Summers, then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, blocked efforts by Brooksley Born, then-chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to regulate the derivatives market. It later expanded to include the toxic instruments that led to the 2008 financial market crisis.
Summers also sought repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, the Depression-era law separating commercial and investment banking.
“If you nominate someone who is a life-committed deregulator to be in a regulatory position, and if you believe regulation is necessary to prevent fraud, abuse, manipulation and so forth, then there’s a lot of questions to be asked: Why is this person appropriate?” Merkley said in a July interview.

Budget Negotiations

Even those that said they would support Summers voiced concern in interviews about the intraparty fight a Summers nomination would cause in the weeks ahead. Democrats, who hold a 54-46 majority in the Senate, face negotiations on the budget and an increase in the debt ceiling.
“In light of everything he needs from Democrats on the Hill in the weeks and months to come, the last thing he can afford is to antagonize them over the Summers nomination,” Jim Manley, a former senior aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said of Obama in a telephone interview.
A tough confirmation fight that split Democrats was an unwelcome possibility, three aides familiar with the discussions said. That message was conveyed to the White House by the camp opposed to Summers, according to one of the Senate aides.

Senate Republicans

Some Republicans were approached by the White House as late as last week as the administration tried to get a better sense of whether Summers could win the required support, one of the aides said. While the entreaties were not rejected, the potential price of the votes was considered too steep, as was the reliability of the Republican lawmakers.
“If they really thought they could pick up the Republican votes necessary to provide a comfortable margin they still can’t figure out what’s going on up on the Hill,” said Manley.
By Sept. 13, what was becoming apparent to the White House earlier in the week would be hammered home. Tester, the Montana Democrat, released a statement announcing opposition to Summers.
Two days later, Summers’s letter arrived, on the five-year anniversary of the peak of the financial collapse that ushered in the crisis Summers fought side-by-side with Obama to contain.
To contact the reporters on this story: Julianna Goldman in Washington at jgoldman6@bloomberg.net; Cheyenne Hopkins in Washington at chopkins19@bloomberg.net; Phil Mattingly in Washington at pmattingly@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Komarow at skomarow1@bloomberg.net

Long Hot Summers

So Larry Summers has withdrawn himself from consideration for the Chairmanship of the Federal Reserve. Rumors had it that Summers was President Obama's  first choice for the job, but it appears that resistance from Democrats in Congress have proven to be too much to overcome. It is disgraceful how politicized all of these nominations have become. I'll bet you that most of the people who have announced their opposition to Summers probably have no idea of his real views of how the Fed should be run, rather they are simply passing judgement about the anti-women comments he made at Harvard years ago. This is political correctness run amok. It is absurd that they actually didn't want Summers to testify before the Finance Committee, because then they might have to listen to what he was saying.

So now the President has to take another one on the chin. With a huge fight looming over the debt ceiling, Obamacare and the budget, The President cannot afford to alienate members of his own party, and Summers has lightened the load for him. But, Obama's problems will only grow as he as done nothing to create any working relationships with Congress.

It does not matter what position is up for congressional confirmation, the entire process has been polluted by foul politics that has enveloped Washington. The ultimate result is dysfunctional government, and that's not what we're paying a lot of money in taxes for.